The Catholic philosopher John Royal Eluana defines the case of "abuse on the part of a technological civilization that claims to replace nature," and warns that "has lost the wisdom of the right size and the Church, and the government with her, are victims of this dominant cultural paradigm, that he wanted to keep alive Eluana against nature. " What
some time ago sull'accanimento therapeutic, was the preamble to the current debate, and consists of applying, in absence of informed consent, of medical techniques involving the use of equipment and drugs in order to artificially support functions life of individuals suffering from incurable diseases and resulting in their death in the absence of the use of such techniques. Informed consent is the foundation of the legitimacy of health, without which the activity is a crime. The purpose of seeking informed consent is therefore to promote the autonomy of the individual in the context of medical decisions. The patient can decide if it wants to be treated for a disease and has the right / duty to know all available information about their health and asked the doctor what is not clear, also must be able to choose in an informed way, if you submit to a particular treatment, diagnostic test or surgery.
Pain therapy in turn has reopened the issue of euthanasia because high dosage of drugs (mainly opiates such as morphine) may cause the patient's death, while trying to submit it without their suffering.
to forge a personal opinion on topics as "vital" I had, of course, documents and I found that art. 32 of the Italian Constitution states that "nobody can be forced to a specific medical treatment unless required by law, in line with the fundamental principle of the inviolability of personal liberty (Article 13). That "if not required by law" was a slap in the face. It is true that it was necessary to establish the primacy of law over the individual will be finalized when the common good (compulsory vaccination, quarantine, etc..), But Art. 32 by failing to make any reference to it, it ends up contradicting it mentioned in Article 13, by declaring in unison. Similar principles also apply in other countries.
The Italian legal system the law of March 28, 2001, No 145 have ratified the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, signed in Oviedo on 4 April 1997. The Convention of Oviedo dedicated to the definition of the Consensus Chapter II (Articles 5 to 9) in which establishes the general rule that: "An intervention in the field of health can not be made until after the person concerned has given free and informed consent. This person shall beforehand be given appropriate information on the purpose and nature of the intervention and its consequences and risks. The person concerned may, at any time, freely withdraw consent. " (Article 5). The Oviedo Convention also establishes the need for the consent of a "representative" of the patient if this is a minor or is unable to express themselves. Finally, the Convention states that "The previously expressed wishes about medical intervention by a patient at surgery can not to express his will, will be taken into account. "
In conclusion, it was widely stated in clear terms, that I only treat myself or I can decide whether to undergo surgery and the doctor has an obligation to clearly informed and answer any questions which need to complete my information. So, if you decide to refuse treatment or intervention, I would be the sole arbiter of my life. It must, however, the physical condition of self-sufficiency would allow me , however, and at all times, to be able to commit suicide in other ways, and would make no sense to prevent it groped with the obligation to undergo medical treatment or interventions. Completely different is the condition of machines and kept alive by force-feeding in which case I would not be in a position to subvert the decisions of others by suicide opposite to mine, and here is where the looting "clear and fierce", the intent of forced to co-opt religious beliefs of "who controls" imposed from a position of undoubted strength. This is a coward, because abuse of the condition of physical weakness and dependence to assume the same power of decision, to live or die, before I had hypocritically acknowledged having been unable to do otherwise.
Man has tried always to get the win death, he did already very long time, imagining another life after death and has continued in its recent history, with animist religions. Hibernation has been perhaps the first attempt to prevent death from disease. But while the transplant of organs along with medical care and surgery are trying to prolong life, advanced life support, which uses equipment that can substitute for lung function, heart disease, nutrition and hydration even indefinitely, in the misunderstanding of ' political interference, it would seem designed to prevent.
For as it was formulated, the draft law on living wills, political abuse is aimed at a pathetic result against nature far away from the logic of medical ethics, is a clear and inappropriate interference in an area that relates solely to the agency, untouchable value of human dignity.
expect respect for their ideas and beliefs without giving, is an indication of inadequacy and uncivil arrogance.
some time ago sull'accanimento therapeutic, was the preamble to the current debate, and consists of applying, in absence of informed consent, of medical techniques involving the use of equipment and drugs in order to artificially support functions life of individuals suffering from incurable diseases and resulting in their death in the absence of the use of such techniques. Informed consent is the foundation of the legitimacy of health, without which the activity is a crime. The purpose of seeking informed consent is therefore to promote the autonomy of the individual in the context of medical decisions. The patient can decide if it wants to be treated for a disease and has the right / duty to know all available information about their health and asked the doctor what is not clear, also must be able to choose in an informed way, if you submit to a particular treatment, diagnostic test or surgery.
Pain therapy in turn has reopened the issue of euthanasia because high dosage of drugs (mainly opiates such as morphine) may cause the patient's death, while trying to submit it without their suffering.
to forge a personal opinion on topics as "vital" I had, of course, documents and I found that art. 32 of the Italian Constitution states that "nobody can be forced to a specific medical treatment unless required by law, in line with the fundamental principle of the inviolability of personal liberty (Article 13). That "if not required by law" was a slap in the face. It is true that it was necessary to establish the primacy of law over the individual will be finalized when the common good (compulsory vaccination, quarantine, etc..), But Art. 32 by failing to make any reference to it, it ends up contradicting it mentioned in Article 13, by declaring in unison. Similar principles also apply in other countries.
The Italian legal system the law of March 28, 2001, No 145 have ratified the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, signed in Oviedo on 4 April 1997. The Convention of Oviedo dedicated to the definition of the Consensus Chapter II (Articles 5 to 9) in which establishes the general rule that: "An intervention in the field of health can not be made until after the person concerned has given free and informed consent. This person shall beforehand be given appropriate information on the purpose and nature of the intervention and its consequences and risks. The person concerned may, at any time, freely withdraw consent. " (Article 5). The Oviedo Convention also establishes the need for the consent of a "representative" of the patient if this is a minor or is unable to express themselves. Finally, the Convention states that "The previously expressed wishes about medical intervention by a patient at surgery can not to express his will, will be taken into account. "
In conclusion, it was widely stated in clear terms, that I only treat myself or I can decide whether to undergo surgery and the doctor has an obligation to clearly informed and answer any questions which need to complete my information. So, if you decide to refuse treatment or intervention, I would be the sole arbiter of my life. It must, however, the physical condition of self-sufficiency would allow me , however, and at all times, to be able to commit suicide in other ways, and would make no sense to prevent it groped with the obligation to undergo medical treatment or interventions. Completely different is the condition of machines and kept alive by force-feeding in which case I would not be in a position to subvert the decisions of others by suicide opposite to mine, and here is where the looting "clear and fierce", the intent of forced to co-opt religious beliefs of "who controls" imposed from a position of undoubted strength. This is a coward, because abuse of the condition of physical weakness and dependence to assume the same power of decision, to live or die, before I had hypocritically acknowledged having been unable to do otherwise.
Man has tried always to get the win death, he did already very long time, imagining another life after death and has continued in its recent history, with animist religions. Hibernation has been perhaps the first attempt to prevent death from disease. But while the transplant of organs along with medical care and surgery are trying to prolong life, advanced life support, which uses equipment that can substitute for lung function, heart disease, nutrition and hydration even indefinitely, in the misunderstanding of ' political interference, it would seem designed to prevent.
For as it was formulated, the draft law on living wills, political abuse is aimed at a pathetic result against nature far away from the logic of medical ethics, is a clear and inappropriate interference in an area that relates solely to the agency, untouchable value of human dignity.
expect respect for their ideas and beliefs without giving, is an indication of inadequacy and uncivil arrogance.
0 comments:
Post a Comment