Mankind has spent his time by changing the environment to improve living conditions, now it is destroying.
Everyone spends half of existence for ruining his health and the other half to try to retrieve it.
THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE SPECIES ACT trend.
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Texas Title Rates 2010
INCONSISTENT
Mankind has spent his time by changing the environment to improve living conditions, now it is destroying.
Everyone spends half of existence for ruining his health and the other half to try to retrieve it.
THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE SPECIES ACT trend.
Mankind has spent his time by changing the environment to improve living conditions, now it is destroying.
Everyone spends half of existence for ruining his health and the other half to try to retrieve it.
THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE SPECIES ACT trend.
How Long Does It Take To Adopt A Dog
LOVE IDEAL
our brain to make judgments about people, facts, situations or feelings, compares with the consideration of any fact real "model", in memory-resident "ideal model".
fact, there is, for each of us, an ideal model for everything, beauty, news, love, morality etc.
The ideal model of love is our first love, or the one received by his mother, sincere, total, selfless, that does not require reciprocity.
It 's really difficult to find someone who can give us that love is comparable, at par, with the ideal model, or a mother's love, but it is very easy to be disappointed, as one moves away from the other.
The above suggests two simple reasons: 1 - is not reasonable to expect to find the ideal love, it exists only between mother and child, 2 - if your love relationship, a comparison with your model ideal does not stand up, ask yourself what, on the other, you get close to his ideal model.
Even so is quite complicated, but we must take into account an additional factor: whatever the intensity of love that binds a couple, each person's freedom remains as it is, despite every good intention of wanting to do without, that is: not if you do not betray want, but you can.
Love almost always is not the ideal one for each member of the couple are free spaces, and options abound.
These days, the bond of marriage is no longer the glue that holds couples. If there are children, they are not the priority, the divorce rate in fact occur in the presence of children. The ideal love (mother-child) is weakening, because new demands are occurring selfish and the ideal model of the new generations, has a different configuration from the past. This model, ideal love watered, easily leads young people to confuse love with any great love, or to seal the marriage. Many marriages today do not last long because they are like the giant with feet of clay, or like the house with a foundation on sand.
The basic social unit, the family, tends to dissolve. At the same time, you begin to notice the fading of the "values" and the decline of "morality." The lack of work, the resulting uncertainty of the future, have changed the three springs that always move the world: sex, power and money, "all at once, the price tag does not matter.
Everyone who looks to the future, understand that it is difficult to predict developments of this, because rapid changes affecting every aspect of human life, this has never happened before. For the first time in human history and everything is changing very rapidly.
hound incurable diseases, pollution of water, air and food is in addition to climatic changes. Wars and genocide do not tend to decline, poverty and hunger are increasing. Fundamentalism and religious wars keep good pace, the self destruction of humanity, with chemical or nuclear weapons, is always around the corner. The policy and its scandals do not show improvement, the world economy is increasingly fragile. The country borders have less and less meaning, invasions in arms have been replaced by peaceful migration issues and not less, integration is a serious problem, now more than ever. The ease with which anyone can move from one point to another planet, facilitates the transmission new diseases, for which the immune system has not prepared defenses. Viruses, bacteria and parasites resistant to antibiotics and pesticides always better (although they are alive, and then respond to the first imperative of life adapted. The immune system, an increasing number of people, goes haywire because it fails to properly manage huge number of new substances is forced to defend the body to neutralize, in all this, another important role to play the little-known distress (read the post, "Who depresses the SI). The increasingly rapid movement of planetary people and goods has already crippled the capacity, control and management of the phenomenon, in many countries. The distribution and movement of drugs tends to increase dramatically. The gangs have infiltrated deeply in the economy and institutions of many countries.
Some of the problems mentioned have always been part of human history and, for better or worse, have always been resolved. Others are new and certainly not easy to solve, but what really discouraging is the fact that humanity has ever been called upon to resolve, all together, many problems, the real capacity of the implementation of possible solutions is legitimate to have more than some doubts.
the catastrophic highlight the fact that impossible to solve, together, these problems. Logic says that solutions exist, as human history shows that it is necessary to solve them simultaneously.
It 'important to recognize the real need of having to cope with the above problems and find appropriate solutions in a timely manner. A saying in my country says: "While studying u u medicu malatu Sinni goes", or "while the medical studies (the case) the patient dies.
Sunday, August 16, 2009
How Much Calories In Stir Fry Vegetable
HUMANITY 'claiming victory
in human history early hominids dating back more than a million years, prehistory is dated between 20 and 10 thousand years, while the first civilizations go back to just over 5000 years.
In the final part of the twentieth century AD, with increasing quality of life, improved home comfort food hygiene and health care communication shall be paid the exponential increase of human knowledge and technological development without precedent. Nowadays, the progress of humanity, are perceived to be opposed to barbarism.
It is noted that, like the tendency of history to enhance the value of the war, instead of the dead, we continue to celebrate victories and deliverances dedicating holidays.
A little 'memory of recent history: Nazi extermination of the Jews (1938) 5.9 million dead, Roma and Sinti from 500,000 to 1.5000.000, Srebrenica (1995) almost 10,000 deaths, the Assyrian Genocide (1914 1920) 275,000 dead, greek genocide (1908 1923) between 1.5 and 2.0 million deaths, Ukraine famine planned (1933) 7,000,000 deaths , Cambodia (1979-1997) from 800,000 to 3,300,000 dead, Armenia first 1890 seconds massacre massacre in 1909 for a total di1.200.000 dead.
Although the dates of the facts cited are subsequent to 1900, mass killings and genocides continue today with regularity: Sudan Darfur from 40,000 to 450,000 deaths, 80,000 to 1,071,000 from Rwanda, Uganda 300,000, Georgian-Abkhazian war from 10,000 to 30,000, Sri Lanka Civil War 72,000 dead.
From Wikipedia: According to FAO estimates of 2003 [1], more than 25,000 people die of hunger every day, while between 2001 and 2003 more than 800 million people suffer from chronic malnutrition [2] [1]. On average a child dies of hunger every five seconds.
In light of the facts, technical progress, scientific, social and economic, has no connection with human barbarity, remained the same. Each
historical commemoration that refers to a war, it ends up eseltare some false value attached to it.
War is barbarism, can not give any value to civilization, not even for Democracy.
Humanity calling themselves civil claiming victory, but winning is the only human hypocrisy. 
in human history early hominids dating back more than a million years, prehistory is dated between 20 and 10 thousand years, while the first civilizations go back to just over 5000 years.
In the final part of the twentieth century AD, with increasing quality of life, improved home comfort food hygiene and health care communication shall be paid the exponential increase of human knowledge and technological development without precedent. Nowadays, the progress of humanity, are perceived to be opposed to barbarism.
It is noted that, like the tendency of history to enhance the value of the war, instead of the dead, we continue to celebrate victories and deliverances dedicating holidays.
A little 'memory of recent history: Nazi extermination of the Jews (1938) 5.9 million dead, Roma and Sinti from 500,000 to 1.5000.000, Srebrenica (1995) almost 10,000 deaths, the Assyrian Genocide (1914 1920) 275,000 dead, greek genocide (1908 1923) between 1.5 and 2.0 million deaths, Ukraine famine planned (1933) 7,000,000 deaths , Cambodia (1979-1997) from 800,000 to 3,300,000 dead, Armenia first 1890 seconds massacre massacre in 1909 for a total di1.200.000 dead.
Although the dates of the facts cited are subsequent to 1900, mass killings and genocides continue today with regularity: Sudan Darfur from 40,000 to 450,000 deaths, 80,000 to 1,071,000 from Rwanda, Uganda 300,000, Georgian-Abkhazian war from 10,000 to 30,000, Sri Lanka Civil War 72,000 dead.
From Wikipedia: According to FAO estimates of 2003 [1], more than 25,000 people die of hunger every day, while between 2001 and 2003 more than 800 million people suffer from chronic malnutrition [2] [1]. On average a child dies of hunger every five seconds.
In light of the facts, technical progress, scientific, social and economic, has no connection with human barbarity, remained the same. Each
historical commemoration that refers to a war, it ends up eseltare some false value attached to it.
War is barbarism, can not give any value to civilization, not even for Democracy.
Humanity calling themselves civil claiming victory, but winning is the only human hypocrisy.
Friday, August 14, 2009
Car Wash Milena Velba
labor and capital
labor and capital, different view of the relationship that binds them, always leads to irreconcilable positions. I begin by saying that without work there is no capital and I intend to work for others, only with its own can not accomplish much. The ability to do business or have the organizational ability, should have a finite value to quantify the increased value of business and a dividend in proportion to risk and capacity. A company that does not jeopardize the capital can not achieve anything and get nothing without the work of others. The philosophy that the entire principal is due and work only on fixed income is perfectly contrasted with the other: the capital without the contribution of the work can not achieve anything. This game is played on the quantity of supply and demand, clearly biased in favor of those offering work, a few, and offer of cooperation, enormous. Hence, the resulting belief that the worker is one who can create nothing, neither values \u200b\u200bnor anti-values, but that is only intended to implementation. The error, in my view, is to consider the working capital and a negative value an absolute value. Our Constitution (and I repeat), to Article 1, the Republic founded on work, thus providing tremendous value and priority. If it were true that the creative ability is an absolute value, Michelangelo, Einstein and a long list of genes, would have had to embarrass Scrooge McDuck, but it was not, perhaps they lacked the ability to make money on talent, has gotten a lot more of them Bill Gates, despite not having invented the PC and without having developed any particular technology but simply inventing the windows system (Windows) ... ... Perhaps the world is not directed only to the smart, because if we had all these no one would buy Argentine bonds, or "products" Lehman Brothers, and we would not be to turn over their thumbs waiting for the next smart. The capital thus produces great wealth for themselves and disproportionately miserable for those that attached to it in various ways, unwittingly run the risks involved. As I have stated here could be considered part of the Marxist theory, I've never read Marx, but I've heard a lot, my only thought is of an ordinary man. 
labor and capital, different view of the relationship that binds them, always leads to irreconcilable positions. I begin by saying that without work there is no capital and I intend to work for others, only with its own can not accomplish much. The ability to do business or have the organizational ability, should have a finite value to quantify the increased value of business and a dividend in proportion to risk and capacity. A company that does not jeopardize the capital can not achieve anything and get nothing without the work of others. The philosophy that the entire principal is due and work only on fixed income is perfectly contrasted with the other: the capital without the contribution of the work can not achieve anything. This game is played on the quantity of supply and demand, clearly biased in favor of those offering work, a few, and offer of cooperation, enormous. Hence, the resulting belief that the worker is one who can create nothing, neither values \u200b\u200bnor anti-values, but that is only intended to implementation. The error, in my view, is to consider the working capital and a negative value an absolute value. Our Constitution (and I repeat), to Article 1, the Republic founded on work, thus providing tremendous value and priority. If it were true that the creative ability is an absolute value, Michelangelo, Einstein and a long list of genes, would have had to embarrass Scrooge McDuck, but it was not, perhaps they lacked the ability to make money on talent, has gotten a lot more of them Bill Gates, despite not having invented the PC and without having developed any particular technology but simply inventing the windows system (Windows) ... ... Perhaps the world is not directed only to the smart, because if we had all these no one would buy Argentine bonds, or "products" Lehman Brothers, and we would not be to turn over their thumbs waiting for the next smart. The capital thus produces great wealth for themselves and disproportionately miserable for those that attached to it in various ways, unwittingly run the risks involved. As I have stated here could be considered part of the Marxist theory, I've never read Marx, but I've heard a lot, my only thought is of an ordinary man.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)