labor and capital, different view of the relationship that binds them, always leads to irreconcilable positions. I begin by saying that without work there is no capital and I intend to work for others, only with its own can not accomplish much. The ability to do business or have the organizational ability, should have a finite value to quantify the increased value of business and a dividend in proportion to risk and capacity. A company that does not jeopardize the capital can not achieve anything and get nothing without the work of others. The philosophy that the entire principal is due and work only on fixed income is perfectly contrasted with the other: the capital without the contribution of the work can not achieve anything. This game is played on the quantity of supply and demand, clearly biased in favor of those offering work, a few, and offer of cooperation, enormous. Hence, the resulting belief that the worker is one who can create nothing, neither values \u200b\u200bnor anti-values, but that is only intended to implementation. The error, in my view, is to consider the working capital and a negative value an absolute value. Our Constitution (and I repeat), to Article 1, the Republic founded on work, thus providing tremendous value and priority. If it were true that the creative ability is an absolute value, Michelangelo, Einstein and a long list of genes, would have had to embarrass Scrooge McDuck, but it was not, perhaps they lacked the ability to make money on talent, has gotten a lot more of them Bill Gates, despite not having invented the PC and without having developed any particular technology but simply inventing the windows system (Windows) ... ... Perhaps the world is not directed only to the smart, because if we had all these no one would buy Argentine bonds, or "products" Lehman Brothers, and we would not be to turn over their thumbs waiting for the next smart. The capital thus produces great wealth for themselves and disproportionately miserable for those that attached to it in various ways, unwittingly run the risks involved. As I have stated here could be considered part of the Marxist theory, I've never read Marx, but I've heard a lot, my only thought is of an ordinary man.
0 comments:
Post a Comment